Anonymous

My feedback

  1. 64 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I agree, at one time I thought the product groups had a requirement to deliver a MP for their products, this needs to return if MS wants to stay in the monitoring game.
    Azure MP is very weak
    O365 MP is garbage
    TFS / VSTS / now Azure Dev or whatever no MP exist anymore.

  2. 61 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  General Operations Manager Feedback » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    Audit history needs to be beefed up in many ways. It doesn't help to say was modified. Any action taken on the alert should show what field was updated to what value by who and when. This should also include notifications.

  3. 45 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General Operations Manager Feedback » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I agree, it should remain unmonitored until a healthy response is generated and not just default to healthy waiting for an unhealthy response. No clear way to know if a monitor is working.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  4. 150 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    under review  ·  9 comments  ·  General Operations Manager Feedback  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I see no reason why this isn't a great idea. Our operator always have to come to the Admins to know how an alert is configured. No reason why this isn't exposed to operators.

  5. 157 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  6. 3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General Operations Manager Feedback » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Anonymous shared this idea  · 
  7. 11 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    this is a strange behavior to only receive 1 trap version. due to the discovery already having to take place there is no reason to filter out traps from a known device that I can think of.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  8. 10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  General Operations Manager Feedback » General  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    This is one big thing we miss from BMC Patrol. Users don't always want to know when a event happened once, but if it continues to happen over a period of time.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base